Tag archives for Christmas

Carols after Christmas

 Jesus is born . . .
Creative Commons License photo credit: krisdecurtis

We woke up yesterday and went to church here in Williamsburg where we’re vacationing for the week. I employed the best method possible in finding a solid, evangelical church to worship at on the Lord’s Day: the phone book. Flipping through, we had an extended list of almost every conceivable denomination. We decided that we wanted to do something a bit different and go to a service at a denomination of church that none of us had ever visited.

I was immediately partial to a Coptic Orthodox church, but my sister-in-law wasn’t so sure about the possibility of incense. I then suggested we go Presbyterian. Still, so many to choose from. Is it the PCA or PCUSA that are the more evangelical, missions-minded denomination? We went with a good orthodox sounding name:  Grace Covenant. We like grace and I’m interested in covenant theology. It seemed like a good fit.

Great service. I was struck by, and this is the main purpose of this post, the singing of carols after Christmas. All except for one of the songs sung yesterday morning were Christmas carols. They’re hymns nonetheless, but they’re primarily now known as Christmas carols.

Doesn’t it make all the sense in the world to sing most of our carols after Christmas rather than before? They tell of the newborn babe lying in a manger. If the purpose of Christmas is to re-live the advent of the Savior, then the month leading up to the Day should be spent reading prophecy and the opening chapters of Matthew and Luke, stopping short of the actual birth narratives. The songs sung should be sung to match. Instead, we sing of the Savior’s birth before we celebrate it happening. Yesterday morning, it was refreshing to reflect on the birth of Savior through Christmas carols after we had celebrated it–or should have–on Christmas Day.

There is so much theology packed into these carol-hymns. Check out the last verse of Hark, the Herald Angels Sing:

Adam’s likeness, Lord, efface,
Stamp Thine image in its place:
Second Adam from above,
Reinstate us in Thy love.
Let us Thee, though lost, regain,
Thee, the Life, the inner man:
O, to all Thyself impart,
Formed in each believing heart.

Let’s spend the month of January singing about the new-born King rather than jumping straight to Easter.

Posted in Christianity, Music, Theology | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Santa Punched Arius

punch
Creative Commons License photo credit: tim caynes

For all the legend surrounding Santa Claus and Christmas, it’s surprising that the best story concerning the early Christian saint is forgotten.  Saint Nicholas was a real person. He was the bishop of Myra and defender of young women’s honor and Christian orthodoxy. It’s not only believed that he attended the Council of Nicea in 325 but that he also showed Arius who’s boss with a little fist-in-face action.

At the first Council of Nicea, Nicholas, bishop of Myra, met the arguments of Arius by bestowing upon the jaw of that venerable presbyter such a violent blow that a temporary disuse of that important organ of debate was rendered necessary (Lewis George Janes, A Study of Primitive Christianity, 294).

So when Santa comes to town, a lump of coal should be the least of your worries!

Posted in Christianity | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

When Gentiles Sing to Jews

If I had to preach a Christmas sermon, the following is what I would preach, “When Gentiles Sing to Jews.”

I wonder if we totally grasp the weight of the incarnation of the Son of God, coming as a small Christ child.

Luke 1-2 should serve as a reminder to those of us who are Gentiles that the coming of the Messiah is primarily a Jewish event. Luke, who may have been a gentile, understood this. Keeping with his expressed purpose in Luke 1:1-4, the evangelist writes in the remainder of the first chapter and into the second to inform us of the events surrounding the advent of the Christ child. It is not insignificant that the events he’s preserved for us are entirely and utterly Jewish.

Luke 1:5 further introduces the Jewish Christ story with mention of the King of Judea and a priest whose wife was a daughter of Aaron. They walk “blamelessly in all the commandments and statutes of the Lord” though without a child. Reminiscent of Hannah? Possibly, though Mary is a far more likely candidate. Next, Zechariah is chosen by lot to enter the temple. Gabriel appears and the forerunner of the Messiah is foretold. It’s all sounding completely Jewish and we could continue to see the explicit and tease out the implicit should we wish, but the Christmas story isn’t simply about the coming of the Jewish Messiah. It’s about a recalling the hints of the expansion of God’s people by the Messiah.

Consider, for example, Isaiah 49. The prophetic word opens entreating the “peoples from afar” to listen up. This includes you and I. Everyone should perk up when YHWH speaks to the nations. The prophet then speaks of the Lord’s servant “Israel, in whom I will be glorified.” Is this a redefinition of Israel? The Messiah as (an) Israel? He continues with a thrilling word:

“Is it too light a thing that you should be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob and to bring back the preserved of Israel [? Yes]; I will make you as a light for the nations, that my salvation may reach to the end of the earth” (Isaiah 49:6).

This salvation is a person and he is the Christmas story. The wonder of the Christmas story is not only that the Jewish Messiah has come to “save his people from their sins” but that Gentiles are included so that this salvation is global in extent.  What a wonderful surprise! The Gentile inclusion opens up a new whole new aspect of the work of the Messiah like one opening a door to an attic which had been shut up for ages. The treasures in that attic were there the whole time–hidden from eternity past?–but only recently (first century AD) brought to light. Paul calls it a “mystery” which has been made known by “holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit” (Ephesians 3:5). And as if we should start to wonder exactly what that mystery which has been made known is, he spells it out plainly:

“This mystery is that the Gentiles are fellow heirs, members of the same body, and partakers of the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel” (Ephesians 3:6).

Revisiting the attic analogy, Paul writes that “the mystery of Christ…was not made known to the sons of men in other generations as it has now been revealed” (Eph 3:4-5). It’s not that the “mystery” wasn’t there but that it was just that, a mystery and it had to be revealed.

Praise be to God! The Christ child whom we celebrate this season makes this mystery possible and known!

With the mystery in mind, we shall look closely at a mystery-laden Christmas hymn commonly sung in churches during Advent, O Come, O Come Emmanuel. Familiarize yourself with the hymn if you’re feeling a little rusty since  last year. I want to draw your attention to the refrain with which you will undoubtedly be familiar:

Rejoice! Rejoice!
Emmanuel shall come to thee, O Israel.

Note that the twice repeated “Rejoice!” is a command. You, rejoice! I’m talking to you. Who’s talking? Everyone singing? Sure, but more specifically, I think the speaker is supposed to be a Gentile. The last verse seems to imply this (“O, Desire of nations”) coupled with the third person references to Israel scattered throughout. So, we’ve got Gentiles singing. What are they singing? Of whom are they singing? Singing of Emmanuel…God with us…the Messiah. To whom are the Gentiles singing of the Messiah? To Israel!

O Come, O Come, Emmanuel employs Gentiles to sing of the Messiah to Israel. It seems kind of backwards doesn’t it? This is the partial hardening (Romans 11:25).  Shouldn’t Israel be singing “Rejoice! Rejoice! Emmanuel shall come even unto you, O nations!” That’s what you would think; but the mystery changes our thinking.

When we Gentiles sing this hymn we should be overwhelmed with grief for unbelieving Israel. We should be overwhelmed by the fact that we are singing to them instead of them singing to us. We shouldn’t be singing at all, but Christ is such a great savior that we can’t help but sing and to all nations and most certainly to unbelieving Israel. Yes, we proclaim their Messiah and their salvation, but by the mystery and the mind-expanding work of Christ, he is also our Messiah and our salvation. We sing. We sing.

When Gentiles sing to Jews about the Messiah, may we be reminded of the Gentile inclusion, meaning that we who were not a people have been brought near by the blood of the final Passover Lamb who has expanded what it means to be the people of God and children of Abraham.

Hallelujah!

Posted in Christianity, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Celine Dion’s Christmas Confession

One of the best things about Christmastime is that all the biggest pop stars just have to sing Christmas carols. They must. And we do reap the benefits. Tonight hearing Celine Dion sing O Holy Night was quite amazing, even though with a slight Canadian tinge.

A second one-of-the-best-things-about-Christmastime is the theology inescapably present in carols. All of sudden glitzy starlets turn from singing the praises of their many paramours to the glories of the advent of the Christ child. In so doing the themes of sin, judgment, reconciliation, true peace, salvation, redemption, and God’s provision fill the airwaves for the season until we’ve gotten what we wanted from under the tree and can tuck these confronting, blatantly Christian topics away into the attic with all our Christmas decor. Out of sight, out of mind.

The theology present in carols highlights a difference between Christianity and Islam to which I would like to draw your attention. Tonight as I listened to the mellifulously sopranic voice of Celine declare over the radio for all of North America to hear Christ is the Lord! O praise His Name forever I was struck by the ineffective nature of her otherwise decidely Christian confession. Let the reader recall the somewhat infamous martyrdom of Polycarp at which time he was called upon to declare Kurios Caesar (“Caesar is Lord”) but rather than choosing to deny his Lord replied securely Kurios Iesous (“Jesus is Lord”). This is the most basic Christian confession. Indeed at the church I attend the baptized are asked “What is your confession?” to which the expected response is “Jesus is Lord.” However, much to my chagrin, there is reason to believe that Celine Dion along with the company of fifty plus artists who have recorded this carol in singing out “Christ is the Lord!” are not making heart-felt, Spirit-induced confessions of the lordship of Jesus of Nazareth.

In Christianity, just saying the words is not what renders a confession effectual. Yes, Paul affirms in Romans 10:9 that “if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” But Jesus’ words in John 6:44 are also true “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him.” This is not to deter anyone from Christianity or from turning to Christ for the forgiveness of sins; but to deter a flippant confession by which one might expect to be saved apart from the work of the Holy Spirit (cf. 1 Corinthians 12:3). This then is where the difference between Christianity and Islam emerges.

The Shahada

Al-Islam.org in a section entitled If You Decide to Convert outlines what it takes to become a Muslim:

Ash hadoo an laa ilaahaa ilallaah [I bear witness that there is no god but Allah (one god)]

Ash hadoo anna Muhammadan Rasoollallah (I bear witness that Muhammad is the Prophet of Allah).

If you state those two things with belief and conviction, you are Muslim.

Unlike Christianity, in Islam there is a magic formula, the Shahada, whereby one becomes Muslim upon declaration in Arabic. Later on in the above-linked article the new convert is advised:

When you get the chance, meet with someone who already knows the prayer and they can help you with the Arabic and little details, God willing.

Help with the Arabic seems a most important step. In Christianity, however, each hearer of the gospel is invited to respond by turning to God through Christ in prayer in their heart language and in their own words in faith, for he is not merely God of one tribe, tongue or nation alone, but the high king of heaven around whose throne peoples from all nations will gather.

Caroling Doesn’t Save

Christmastime is therefore not an automatic in-gathering of carolers but a season during which each listener gains another precious opportunity to take in the glories of God in Christ reconciling the world to himself (2 Corinthians 5:19). Each season gives the gospel another spin on the record players and over the airwaves only to be ignored and superficially melodically enjoyed. Were this a time during which the Shahada filled the airwaves set to infectiously hum-worthy tunes we might all awake on Boxing Day Muslims!

Posted in Christianity, Music, Theology | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

An English Christmas

Leaving on Wednesday (12/12), we’re heading to England over Christmas and New Years. We’ll be back just in time (the day before) to start our respective schools on January 7th. J-term Hebrew I, here I come.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Swedish Greys - a WordPress theme from Nordic Themepark.