Tag archives for SBC

Around Jesus, Not a Table

Meeting Table
Creative Commons License photo credit: mnadi

It’s not that you have a place “around the table” of Christianity, for there is no table. There’s a person, Jesus Christ. We don’t gather around, rally around, an abstract idea or a metaphorical table but a person. He is the what we gather and rally around. We should then ask ourselves whether we have a place around Jesus to discuss the things of Christianity, not whether we have a place at an abstract “table.”

Several semesters ago during the presidential forum at Southeastern (SEBTS) the question was asked of President Danny Akin whether Arminians had a place at the table of Southern Baptists. His response was to the effect that if you can affirm the Baptist Faith & Message (BF&M), you have a seat around the Southern Baptist table. You see within the BF&M is contained the basics (and not so basics) of what it is to be a Southern Baptist and on many counts what it means generally to be a Christian. What Akin is driving at is if you cannot afirm along with those with whom you wish to fit in that which they affirm, you have no place around “the table.” A place at the table is contigent upon like affirmation.

So, to find out if you have “a place at the table of Christianity,” ask if you affirm the basic teaching(s) of Christianity: the gospel. I am a sinner in need of a savior. Jesus Christ is that savior. From there, there is much to learn as the whole of the Bible testifies to; but starting here, one gains a seat around Jesus Christ whom we love and worship. He’s the around-which we should be looking to gather.

It is with this understanding of Christianity that we can proceed to enjoy the multiethnic beauty of Christians that make up his body. One musn’t have completed seminary to have a voice. Neither must one be Caucasian, nor must one be non-Caucasian. You gather around him because you love him, and you there (read: at him) find others around him much (un-)like yourself. What this all means completely I’m not quite sure; but that’s OK. It’s a good place to re-orient one’s thinking to.

(Reading The Mission of God has inspired this post [Chapter 1]. Yes, you should own it. Thanks, JBA!)

Posted in Christianity, Theology | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mode of Communion

Table
Creative Commons License photo credit: Lance McCord

Baptists are going to insist that the proper mode of baptism is immersion; however, when it comes to the taking of communion, we are not equally insistent on the mode. Grape juice is often taken in place of wine despite the biblical usage of wine.

I guess one could argue, as is often done in matters of teetotalism, that first century “wine” was more akin to juice anyways, but I don’t really wish to go that route and honestly find that apologia silly. Juice doesn’t inebriate. Wine watered down is still wine. (On an interesting note, Justin Martyr points to a tradition of diluting the wine with water representing God, the pure wine, mixing/having communion with the faithful, the water.)

Concerning communion, have we baptists trumped a scriptural precedence of a communion with the fermented fruit of the vine with communion of fermented tradition? Does a cultural prohibition-driven aversion to alcohol prevent biblical communion? Does it even matter? Or should we, more consistently it seems, insist on a scriptural mode of communion as we insist on a scriptural mode of baptism? Or is juice scriptural and this string of questions silly?

Or, shall we just stick with the Welch’s? Welch’s is cheaper after all, isn’t it? But so might be sprinking or pouring compared with filling up a baptistry.

Respond

Go on. You know you want to.

Posted in Christianity | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

As Long as Dr. Hogg Teaches, There’s Only One Choice for Church History

As long as Dr. Hogg teaches, there’s only one choice for Church History at Southeastern. Dr. David S. Hogg is also the only Church History professor I’ve taken at Southeastern. But as I say to people who ask why I got married so young: why keep looking if you’ve found what you were looking for? There’s only one choice for Church History at Southeastern. What I can appreciate about Dr. Hogg is that he hasn’t gone through the “Southern Baptist” education system, majoring in Bible at Famous Baptist of Yesteryear College in Podunk, South, but has worked through the University of Toronto, Westminster Seminary and the University of St. Andrews. As one reviewer noted on RateMyProfessor, he is “quite possibly the coolest Canadian in existence.” Why he is at Southeastern we may never know, but that he is we can rejoice for the way he de-homogenizes our SBC milk. In summary and because I’m enjoying lists at the moment, here are some further pointers evincing the notion that one should take a professor and not a course, in this case Hogg:

  • No textbook.
  • In place of a textbook are primary sources that are freely available in the public domain. Instead of reading what someone has to say about Athanasius, you read Athanasius. What a concept.
  • Direct application to ministry. Hogg asks, what can we learn from the ministry of John Chrysostom? Nobody asks that question and for three reasons: (1) they don’t know Chrysostom, (2) they don’t know to even ask about Chrysostom’s ministry, and (3) they don’t know Chrysostom’s ministry and the practical import thereof.
  • Hard exams. You actually feel like you’re in seminary, not a Sunday school class.
  • Balance. We considered the basis for the papacy. Not only that, but we did a long section on the popes of the Middle Ages.
  • Regular writing exercises instead of regular quizzes. Last semester’s syllabus contained this quote by Augustine: “I count myself one of the number of those who write as they learn and learn as they write.”
  • History is narrated instead of regurgitated from a Powerpoint.

I’m excited to see that he has also taken on teaching Theology. My Friday’s will be spent with him next semester in Theology II.

Posted in Everyday | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Answering the Call to a Great Commission Resurgence

Our SEBTS president, Dr. Akin, emailed to the student body and posted on his website the paper he delivered at the SBC Building Bridges Conference this week entitled “Answering the Call to a Great Commission Resurgence.” I’ve yet to give it a gander, but can guess where he’s going to go with it and am interested to hear comments on it and the Conference in general around the blogosphere. It seems like Timmy Brister’s blog is a good place to keep up with things and download MP3s and PDFs of the presentations.

Here are links to Akin’s paper:
PDF
Online (Google Documents)

Posted in Everyday | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Misconceptions of Calvinism

I am pleased that the Southern Baptist Convention has organized the Building Bridges Conference that is to take place at the end of this month to discuss Calvinism. Moreover, it’s right that Nathan Finn should be giving an address on the misconceptions of Calvinism because of his irenic, Christ-like demeanor. I would like to contribute to the conversation and polling of opinions he has started over at his blog by adding some thoughts here and would encourage readers to do the same but by leaving thoughts at his blog (or here, too, if you must). Hopefully, my thinking on this subject here won’t add to the confusion of further mischaracterization.

An obvious place to lead in talking about misconceptions of Calvinism is the so-called five points of Calvinism. One could talk about the misconceptions of unconditional election, limited atonement, or total depravity. However, I believe this is granting too much and shows a misconception in itself, namely that Calvinism is simply five points. We will do well to remember that the five points of Calvinism were not first set forward by Calvinists as the Calvinist’s credo, but were five points of doctrine with which the followers of Jacob Arminius found disagreement. The five points of Calvinism may say more about Arminians than they do about Calvinists. Consequently, I believe it a misconception to think merely of Calvinism (the outworking of theology after Calvin) merely as five points. The five points of Calvinism are the five points at which there was found disagreement by another man’s followers at the Synod of Dort and do not encompass all that is theology done after the thinking of Calvin and the reformers, both magisterial and radical. (1) Calvinism is more than “Calvinism.” Calvinism entails a certain doctrine of God, an ecclesiology, a view of sacraments, and much more that I have yet to discover. Further, this may be one reason why many evangelicals are more comfortable, like I, of referring to their theology rather as reformed than Calvinistic, though not afraid of the term Calvinism.

The last sentence above reveals another misconception worthy of address. (2) Calvinists bearing the surname of John Calvin show their indebtedness to him, but (in many cases) no special attachment to or affinity for his person. In other words, accepting the name “Calvinist” is very much unlike accepting the name “Christian” in that, while the Christian does, can and should rightfully appropriate wholesale the Christ to life, the Calvinist does not and should not the person of John Calvin. Therefore, the argument that Calvin was not a Calvinist is useless and impotent because the Calvinist is not so much concerned with Calvin per se as much as doing theology after him. Nonetheless, was Jesus a Christian?

I will end with what I see as the most common misconception of Calvinism: that because God is sovereign in salvation (call it predestination or unconditional election) missions/evangelization is not needed. The misconception is that sovereignty in salvation and evangelization/missions are mutually exclusive. John Piper has done more than anyone that I know of to combat such misguided, incorrect, and ultimately unbiblical thinking (cf. Let the Nations Be Glad). (3) Piper shows that reformed thinking is not the abdicating of, nor antithetical to, missions but a continuously combusting engine driving missions not as an end but as a means to the greatest end of the glory of God in Christ Jesus. It is therefore a gross error to write off Calvinism in one stroke with statements like “If God predestines, why go?” as did one Methodist clergyman-to-be classmate in a history of Christianity course at my state university. Calvin quipped that to fail to proclaim the gospel was to leave Christ in the tomb.

Posted in Christianity, Theology | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Weekly Review: 9-28-07

Theology I (Dr. Keathley)

  • If you’re attending Southeastern and getting the Southern Baptist discount (1/2 off tuition) and plan on not serving in a Southern Baptist church and giving back to the Cooperative Program (which pays that other half of your tuition) after you graduate, you should go down to the Business Office right now and tell them not to give you the discount and start paying the regular price

New Testament I (Dr. Black)

  • I can’t pray unless the Holy Spirit prays, but the Holy Spirit won’t pray unless I pray; prayer is an inter-trinitarian process.
  • “Abba” was an intimate word used by a son to a father wherein obedience (not love) is at the core. The essence of “Abba” is “not my will but yours be done.”

Church History I (Dr. Hogg)

  • Early on (at the time of Jerome) baptisms were done in the nude. (How symbolic of casting off that which is earthly and being born again!)
  • In translating the Bible into Latin (what would later become the Vulgate) Jerome started to translate the Apocrypha, but ceased doing so, considering them uninspired and not Scripture. The apocryphal material was added back into the Vulgate after his death (in a sub-Jerome translation) and continue to be in the canon of the Catholic church today.

Baptist History (Dr. Harper)

  • We think of America being founded on religious liberty for all but, at the time of the colonies, one was only aloud freedom of religious expression insofar as one practiced the denomination of that particular colony. Consequently, to practice otherwise was met with persecution.

The Albert Mohler Radio Program

  • Tuesday – Dr. Mohler interviews Dr. Patterson (President of Southwestern Seminary) about a new degree program in their college that has caused a lot of media attention and controversy: a degree in the humanities with an emphasis in homemaking. The point of the program is this: there are those women who have both the desire and ability to be a stay-at-home homemaker, or those women who may find themselves on the mission field needing to make clothes and subsist without electricity and running water; this program is to equip those women. The program is open to women only (“as soon as we get a pregnant man walking in, we’ll sign him up”); but requires two years of both Classical Greek and Latin. Dr. Patterson invited any dissenters to come take the program and see if they can pass!

The Way of the Master Radio

  • Wednesday – The hosts of the program are on tour in Europe and toured the John Bunyan museum in England (which reminds me that I need to finish Pilgrim’s Progress). This podcast takes the listener right through the museum with the crew.
Posted in Christianity, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Presidential Reflections on the SBC in 2007

The following is a letter (email) recently sent from President Danny Akin of Southeastern Seminary addressed to the student body concerning the Southern Baptist Convention’s 2007 convocation in San Antonio, Texas, and goings-ons related to Southeastern.

Having returned home from the annual meeting of the SBC in San Antonio, I again was reminded why I love and appreciate the people called Southern Baptists. We are not perfect to be sure. Sometimes we can be somewhat funny and even a bit strange in how we do business. Still, our love for the Lord Jesus, devotion to the Bible, and passion for the lost makes me glad to be a part of this family. It honors me to serve you and our Convention at Southeastern Seminary.

As I have done in previous years, let me share some reflections on this year’s meeting, where I think we are, and where, by God’s grace, we can go in the days ahead. Know that what follows will chart the future for Southeastern Seminary.

First, I rejoice in the re-election of Frank Page as our Convention president, and the election of Jim Richards and Eric Redmond as 1st and 2nd vice presidents. All three are friends of mine, and they are men for whom I have great respect. I will support each of them this coming year, especially with my prayers.

Second, we saw a renewed commitment to the Lordship of Jesus Christ, the sufficiency of Scripture, our doctrinal commitments, and the priority of the Great Commission both at home and abroad. All Southern Baptist should be able to unite around these great affirmations. Along with my fellow seminary presidents, I believe the Baptist Faith and Message 2000 is a solid theological confession to guide us. It is not an exhaustive statement, but it is a sufficient statement. It, along with the Abstract of Principles, will continue to give theological direction to Southeastern. This is what our convention reaffirmed on Tuesday evening. Barry McCarty, our chief parliamentarian said to me at the airport following the Convention, there was no understanding that this motion was asking our agencies to do anything different than what we had been doing. It was a reaffirmation, not a re-direction. In that context let me say this. Your seminaries are not interested in theological witch hunts. At the same time, we will not be ostriches with our heads in the sand. If we spot a teaching that possesses a danger to our churches or will compromise our ability to fulfill the Great Commission, you can rest assured that we will withstand it with all our might.

Third, Southern Baptists are overwhelmingly a body of cessationist and continualist when it comes to spiritual gifts and their activity today. We are not “charismatics” in any historic sense of that word. This is what the recent LifeWay survey clearly revealed, and I am surprised at a number of shrill responses I have heard. I am personally grateful for the research done in this area by LifeWay under the superb leadership of its president Thom Rainer, and I am disappointed that some have questioned Dr. Rainer’s motives and intentions. I have known Thom for more then ten years, and I know him to be a man of the highest degree of integrity. Now, let me put my theological cards on the table as I did at this convention. I am a continualist, “open but cautious,” when it comes to the activity of spiritual gifts in our day. This has been my position since I began teaching at Criswell College almost twenty years ago. It is also the case that I do not have a private prayer language nor do I believe that one can make a good case for a private prayer language from the biblical text. Still, I must be honest and note that good non-charismatic scholars like D.A. Carson and Darrell Bock believe 1 Corinthians 14 allows for the possibility of such a gift. Therefore, for me and for Southeastern Seminary, the issue will be one of priority and agenda. If someone makes private prayer languages an agenda item, then I will oppose them in the strongest measure. In fact, as I said above, I will withstand any agenda or movement that gets in the way of fulfilling the Great Commission of Christ. Perhaps you wonder how many of our faculty at Southeastern has a private prayer language. The answer is I do not know. I have never asked. It is not an issue with this faculty, and it will not become one.

Fourth, I believe it is clear that Southern Baptists have got to grow in the discipline of thinking theologically and living biblically. Hopefully the new Broadman and Holman work, A Theology for the Church, will help us in this area. I had the honor to edit this book, and it includes contributions from some of the brightest and best in Southern Baptist life. Our own David Nelson, Pete Schemm, John Hammett and Ken Keathley participate in this project. You will also discover that Mark Dever, David Dockery, Timothy George, Al Mohler, Russ Moore, Paige Patterson, Malcom Yarnell, and Greg Thornberry penned significant chapters as well. Southern Baptists cannot afford sit on the sidelines when it comes to good and careful theological reflection. At Southeastern we are committed to loving God with our heart and head. We believe in pursuing the model left to us by the apostle Paul, the great theologian and the great missionary. We believe the best context for doing theology is the Great Commission. The best missionaries are capable theologians, and the best theologians are also passionate missionaries. The two must never be separated. This is absolutely essential for the future health of our denomination.

Theological discussion and debate, carried out in the atmosphere of mutual love and respect, is a good and healthy thing. Indeed, it is vitally necessary for the health and well-being of the church. Southeastern is delighted to partner with LifeWay and the Founder’s Ministry in sponsoring a conference on Calvinism at Ridgecrest on November 26-28. No subject needs more light and less heat than this one. Extreme positions and dispositions need to be exposed, confronted and rejected. Areas of agreement that will show how we can work together for the gospel need to be embraced and affirmed. We are thrilled to host on our campus, October 26-27, what is certainly to be the premier C.S. Lewis conference in America in several decades. We also are glad to sponsor a conference on the Emerging/Emergent Church with participants like Mark Driscoll and Ed Stetzer on September 21-22. I applaud neither Pastor Driscoll’s view on alcohol nor his less than wholesome language. The former is unwise and runs the risk of compromising his witness. The latter is blatantly sinful. However, we need to hear and learn from persons like Mark Driscoll in how to effectively engage an increasingly secular culture with the life changing gospel of Jesus Christ. We can learn from those with whom we do not see eye-to-eye theologically, or practically, (e.g. in everyday decisions of Christian living). I want a well informed and educated student body. I believe it is appropriate to invite to a college or seminary campus those you would not invite to speak or lead in worship when your local church gathers for worship. It seems to me that a clear difference exists between the two.

Fifth, I was delighted we approved a resolution on integrity in ministry but disappointed we did do the same for one on regenerate church membership. Some feared the latter was telling the local church what to do, but a resolution can never do that. Some may think there was some political agenda in the works. However, this is a clear biblical and theological issue all Baptist should be able to affirm. Perhaps the resolution presented needs to be reworded or adjusted, but an emphasis on regenerate church membership needs to be recaptured by our churches. I have personally been saying this for several years now. I will continue to speak to this in the days ahead.

Sixth, it was a joy to welcome Geoff Hammond as the new president of North American Mission Board and to receive their fine report. Southeastern hopes to work side by side with the North American Mission Board in the years to come as we seek to reach North America with the gospel of our Lord Jesus.

Finally, this year’s attendance is a cause for grave concern. In spite of “pre-convention activity,” this was one of the smallest conventions in years. Our annual meeting is also aging, and I include myself having turned 50. A younger generation committed to the goals and convictions of the Conservative Resurgence must be sought out. We must get them involved with what we are doing. They need our wisdom and we need their passion and energy. I pledge to do my part to see this happen. I believe what is happening on our seminary campuses is a very hopeful sign.

God has blessed our Convention beyond what we deserved. He has indeed been gracious and faithful. Now is the time for us to come together as a mighty army equipped and ready to take the gospel to the nations. Time is short. The hour is urgent. Heaven and hell are real and Jesus is the only difference. If you come to Southeastern, if you send your children to Southeastern, know that our challenge will not be, “Should you go to the nations?” Rather, it will be, “why would you not go? You have already received the command to go to the nations by the Lord Jesus Himself.” Southeastern is committed to being a Great Commission Seminary, and a Great Commission seminary is what we will be. I love you and consider it a joy words cannot capture to serve you.

Danny Akin

President

Posted in Everyday | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Swedish Greys - a WordPress theme from Nordic Themepark.