Tag archives for Shane Claiborne

Book Review: Radical by David Platt

You’ve seen books like this before. Shane Claiborne has written about it in The Irresistible Revolution: Living as an Ordinary Radical. More recently Francis Chan wrote about it in Crazy Love: Overwhelmed by a Relentless God. These books and now David Platt in Radical: Taking Back Your Faith from the American Dream all point out that something is amiss in much of the way people who bear the name “Christian” live their lives. Revolution is needed. Crazy love is needed. Radical faith is needed. And I agree.

But Platt’s Radical is more of the same. There is the usual litany of Christian heroes who went all out for God: William Carey, Elisabeth Elliot, George Mueller, John Wesley, David Brainerd, among others. And there are also mini biographies of the author’s own congregants and acquaintances who lived radically. This all shows us what we already knew: that people do manage to live radical lives for Jesus. This we know. The problem, however,  is that we’re complacent, disobedient, and seduction-prone followers of Jesus, and some of us know that this ought not be. Others, don’t mind or care; thus, complacency. But, what Platt would hope to accomplish with his book is a radicalizing of the reader’s faith that would push him past complacency and into active, unwavering, sacrificial obedience to Jesus. And while I don’t think Platt quite gets us there, I think he nudges us in the right direction.

If you actually worked it out, you’d probably find that roughly half the book is made up of personal anecdote and well-known Christian tales of heroic faith. This isn’t all bad as there’s a lot of inspiration to be found in these stories. But if you’ve done much reading or spent much time in Christian circles, I bet you’ll be familiar with many of the tales, which at least for me, this familiarity diminishes their power. Again, the problem isn’t that we don’t already know that people live radically. We’ve heard the stories. The problem is that we have a battle within us to do it ourselves, if we’re at least cognizant of Jesus’ demand on our lives. The problem is we’re just not sure if living radically is for us. For me. Platt is helpful on this point. He shows that if we claim to be Jesus’ followers, radical living is for us. It’s what we signed up for and exactly what Jesus demands. It’s time we read about Jesus in the Scriptures instead of crafting our own that fits well with the American dream. Platt’s convinced that “we as Christ followers in American churches have embraced values and ideas that are not only unbiblical but that actually contradict the gospel we claim to believe” (p. 3).

In all the personal stories Platt shares, I’m struck by the sheer number of mission trips this man has taken. It sounds like the man has been to every continent. The back of the book touts this gospel-centered wanderlust to bolster his credentials, but I’m not so awed. I don’t know the details of his trips, but painting them positive with “a passion for the nations” while calling for radical living that eschews extravagance and calls for sacrificial living/giving strikes me as as bit backwards. One need only consult the incredibly enlightening When Helping Hurts to see that short-term mission trips aren’t all they’re packaged to be.

Perhaps the most helpful portion of the book is the concluding chapter in which Platt outlines a plan for radicalizing your faith to leave behind the gospel-opposed cravings of the American dream. There are five parts to the yearlong “radical experiment.” Pray for the entire world. Read your Bible through. Sacrifice money for a specific purpose. Spend time in another context. And commit to a multiplying community. These steps are great and I really think anyone who gives this experiment a go will be blessed. I mean how could you not expect to be a more radical follower of Christ by praying with a global scope, saturating yourself in his word, sacrificing (not just giving), spending time where you normally wouldn’t and planting yourself in a church where disciples are made? You will grow and be blessed. Also, the best part about these steps is that they are exactly what we are commanded to do anyways. Platt isn’t telling us anything new. It may be a new idea to you–an experiment–but Platt recognizes that this is just how we who claim to be Christ’s followers are to live. Radically.

Should you read this book? Well, have you read the two I mentioned above or others like them? If so, I’d say no. Don’t be dazzled by the endorsements. You already know what to do. So, do it. Try out Platt’s radical experiment and do it. But, if this all seems new to you (radical faith in Jesus that is), then you should give this a read. It won’t take long and Platt really makes sure you realize that God and his gospel are central to the Christian life.

Update

I think there is some valuable criticism of the individualism the book propounds in this review.

Posted in Christianity | Tagged , , , , , | 14 Comments

Fire Conference: Benny Hinn in Raleigh

In college I went to hear Michael Moore speak. Earlier in the year I heard Hillary Clinton. About a month ago I hear Shane Claiborne. My philosophy is if someone notable in any regard comes near me, I’ll go hear them speak. So get ready Raleigh for the Fire Conference with Benny Hinn!

The event’s free with pre-registration. I’m not sure what that makes the cost at the door (?), but I went ahead and pre-registered on his site for four people for the 7:00PM Friday session at the Progress Energy Center. That’s next Friday, August 29.

If other bloggers in the area read this and are planning on going, we should get a syncroblog going with after thoughts. Leave a comment showing your interest. If not, it’ll just be me!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Jesus for President Illustrated

What I took away most from the evening with Shane Claiborne (Jesus for President Afterthoughts) was that Christians should be the change that we oftentimes rely upon a secular government to achieve, especially when there’s a divine mandate in Scripture to not only do but be those things. I agree with this. And when taken in conjunction with Claiborne’s pointing out elsewhere (Irresistible Revolution) that we have distanced ourselves from the poor by erecting intermediaries between us and them, I think we have a strong case for actively living out the Scripture’s call for social justice personally, that is with our person. Me doing without intermediary. What he points out is that we oftentimes solely deposit monies in the offering plate and rely on the institution of church to fulfill Christian mandates to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, and care for widows and orphans instead of actually, personally doing those things directly with our persons. The church and other organizations become a buffer between us and them and, in a way, personally and directly we don’t fulfill the mandate.

Illustration

An example presented itself this week. There’s a woman who can be seen walking around Wake Forest and in the parking lots of Southeastern asking for money or a ride. She goes by the name Mindy…or Rita. I’ve been approached by her numerous times as I live, work and study in Wake Forest. I’ve given her food before when see asked for money to buy food. I’ve not given her money, but this past week, she approached a classmate of mine who entered the parking lot up ahead of me asking for money. He declined, apologizing that he didn’t have any cash. After I was in my car, she hurriedly came up to the window asking for a ride to Food Lion. Since she’s approached me many times before I feel like we’re developing a bit of a relationship. So, I greet her and ask if she remembers my name. (I re-introduce myself every time and ask if she remembers me.) She always heartily nods that she remembers me with a sort of glazed, whatever-you-say kinda look. (I’m not quite sure she’s all there.) I declined giving her a ride this time, apologizing that I couldn’t because I had to get to work. (My summer class lets out at noon and I was supposed to be at work at noon.) Though I couldn’t give her a ride to Food Lion this week, I did last week.

So, same scenario but last week I was approached by her asking for a ride. I agreed. (I was late for work.) We met each other again for the first time on the 6 minute drive to Food Lion. On that ride, as with our other encounters, she was quick to show approval to anything I would say or ask, which several times didn’t fit the context of the “conversation” reinforcing my suspicion of a mental handicap. She concurred with the minute gospel message I shared with her saying, “Jesus is our savior.” I asked what she needed from Food Lion. She nodded approvingly. I asked if she was getting food and she interjected rapid-fire yes’s. I asked if she was buying drink or tobacco (I don’t run no no-fare direct flight to cheap smokes!) and after a few rapid-fire approving yes’s, no’s started coming out. Oh well. Anyways…

Next, with glee I asked her if she had heard about the new Wake Forest bus system that was free until the end of the year which just happened to have a stop downtown, by the seminary and at Food Lion. She hadn’t. The nascent bus system was only a few weeks old anyways. That was understandable. I dropped her off and that was it. She got a ride, gospel, and bus info.

Back to this week, after apologizing that I couldn’t offer a ride, I asked her if she had checked out the new bus system which was free. She said no. Curious. I reminded her that it was free and where the stops were. Off she went.

The Point

What does this have to do with Jesus for President? My tax dollars pay for the new bus service which is free until the end of the year. I pay for my car and gas. She can either get a ride with me (sometimes) or get a ride on the free bus service. Am I paying twice for her trip to Food Lion by giving her a ride in my car when she could take the bus which is free, but supported by tax dollars? Can I rely on the bus as an intermediary to give Mindy/Rita a ride? Am I still fulfilling my social dues as a Christian by not giving her a ride but reminding her to catch the free bus? Or, is it wrong to rely on the bus (my government) to do what I should do? Can I respectfully decline giving her a ride and still feel like I’m helping her by mentioning the free bus?

I feel like I can, not because I can’t be bothered to give her a ride (which some days I don’t mind), but because I’ve honestly got to get to work and there is a free bus service. This may sound harsh but I’m going to print out a brochure from the bus’s web site and keep it with me and give it to her the next time she approaches me for a ride.

Conclusion

So while I feel like Christians should deal as much as possible directly with social justice issues (…at what point does someone not having a car become a social issue? We had one car for the longest time and when my wife had the car, I walked. I didn’t think of myself as a social problem which others were indebted to fix…), there are oftentimes good means set up to assist people of which they should take advantage. In conclusion, I feel like I have done both in this situation: (1) helped directly and (2) encouraged societal/governmental help.

Respond

Is it immoral to decline a ride, but hand out a bus brochure? Is it safe to rely on the bus to fulfill what might be my duty? Is it good to encourage society (the government’s bus) to deal with social “problems” by having her ride the bus? Am I loving her appropriately hereby? Did anyone actually read all one thousand eighty-three words of this?

Posted in Christianity | Tagged , | 5 Comments

Jesus for President Afterthoughts

I blogged earlier in the week on going to see Shane Claiborne speak in Raleigh (Jesus for President: Shane Claiborne in Raleigh) on his new book Jesus for President. I knew that it was going to be unlike anything I’d seen or heard and that it was going to be strongly politically charged (e.g., “It’s not a matter of whether you’re political but how you’re political” said Shane), a subject which I normally shy away from for lack of knowledge, understanding and want-to. And though, since reading Scot McKnight’s post on how not to blog and the follow-up comments by readers, I’ve felt fearful of falling into a similar error, I still, because of the impression that evening in Raleigh has had on me, I’ve really wanted to share some thoughts, and so I’ll attempt, despite a slight reserve, to do just that in what I hope will be fair-minded reflection.

[1] The evening was unlike any other Christian speaking event just simply by the presence of Psalter. These guys are really unique, powerful, moving, raw and quite fun to watch and listen to. Their music interspersed in Haw (co-author of Jesus for President) and Claiborne’s dramatic presentation gave the evening a less informal lecture with question and answer feel as I prior to imagined and a more choreographed, rehearsed, presentation or performance feel as I had unexpected, all of course which was fine and led to the evening becoming one massive build up to find an answer to the question “Who should I vote for (‘if at all’)?”

[2] What I reckon anyone can appreciate about the evening is that the speakers started with laying a (biblical) foundation from the ground up for their political views/positions instead of hitting the ground running with their views and leaving everyone without prior knowledge of the book’s contents in the dust. For instance, the presentation started from creation and progressed to roughly the time of Christ (I can’t remember exactly whither) in the first half and then really picked up speed and political charge in the second half by highlighting the church’s rise from 1st century Jewish sect to a 21st century commercial culture by way of Constantine. Each half was roughly an hour and a bit. This was helpful: seeing their case built from the ground up.

[3] The evening had a strong emphasis on what you might call pacificism or anti-war sentiment. (I want to be careful not to mischaracterize the position on war presented by pinning a label on it with which the proponents may not be comfortable; so, forgive me if what they were describing goes by another name. Nonetheless, I think pacificism communicates what I’m trying to describe and is helpful here. Anyways…) The sponsorship of the event by the Triangle Mennonite churches, a body reknowned in its kinship with pacifism, may have had an effect on this, or the present “war” (or, war) in Iraq may also likely be foregrounding the issue. This though is an issue on which I’m not yet willing to be dogmatic and for this reason found myself a bit uncomfortable with the strength of the speaker’s commitment to what I perceived as blanket, over-arching pacificism. I shy away from the extremes and over-simplication on issues like war and pacificism, though it should be noted that a position being an “extreme” or simplified does not necessarily falsify it. I am therefore willing to grant that pacifism may be in the end a biblically tenable position though I’ve not arrived at that conviction at this present hour. Moreover, I found it interesting that in the presentation of the human story from creation to fall to redemption, which had many stops along the way, especially in the OT narrative, (conveniently) by-passed the conquest, a decidedly divine-sanctioned war time in the Bible. A treatment of this material from the pacificistic position would have been, in my opinion, helpful to say the least and worthy of additional respect to the position at most. I had been anticipating a treatment of the conquest as soon as I recognized how the evening’s presentation was progressing through the biblical narrative. It just seems all too convenient to the position to skip it that’s all. I think that much can be admitted.

[4] The presentation of Jesus was interesting. To me, the presentation of him seemed lop-sided and simplistic. While much attention was paid to non-violent, passive Jesus in the Gospels, no mention was made of the returning Christ clothed in a rope dipped in blood with a sword in his mouth supplanting the powers of Satan. This too seemed all to convenient when I reckon the speaker’s thoughts on this topic would have been insightful. One could easily have left assuming God is never violent or forceful.

[5] Repeated “empire” rhetoric was tiring. America is lumped together with Babylon and Rome, all three of which are “the empire.” Unfortunately, I didn’t find this terminology helpful for careful thinking on politics from a Christian perspective. Nebulous.

[6] I was unsure how to think of being an American after the presentation. What I took away from the evening, however, was not to place my faith in a political party or candidate to enact the change which I as a Christian am bound to incarnate as one of YHWH’s people. My first allegiance, as foremost a Christian, is to God, not American. My faithfulness in modeling the life of Jesus will help bring the social change pursued incorrectly by political parties.

[7] At one point we were told to think of saints of the church. Is it telling and/or pitiful that my mind was first taken to Augustine of Hippo who did not find a home in the collage projected on the screen when Desmond Tutu and Dorothy Day did?

Overall, the evening was extremely helpful and I hope my seven afterthoughts above will not in any way disparage the speakers, Chris Haw and Shane Claiborne. Their message is provoking, insightful and fresh. Their emphases on community, radical love, unity, social justice, and radical living are much needed today. So much more could be said, this is just that which comes to mind at the moment.

Respond

Were you there? What did you think? Have you read anyone elses’ afterthoughts on the event? Have I mischaracterized or been unfair or lop-sided myself with mostly uncomfortable afterthoughts?

Posted in Christianity | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Jesus for President: Shane Claiborne in Raleigh

Jesus for President

Jesus for President

Shane Claiborne’s Jesus for President book tour continues this Tuesday (July 22) with a stopover in Raleigh at the First Baptist Church Raleigh which is apparently sponsored by the Triangle Mennonite churches.

It starts at 7:00pm and is free to everyone. I’ll be there and if you’ll be there, wear a red shirt so I’ll know you read this. I hope to offer thoughts on the evening in the coming days. Not an event to be missed if for no other reason than to be challenged.

More info available at the JesusforPresident.org.

Posted in Christianity | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Suffering While Creation Groans

Hey Drew,

I was impressed by your last email. While I was reading it I had a feeling that the words were true and revealed to me something of the real nature of God. I am not sure that I can trust my feelings, though. I may feel differently tomorrow, after I’ve had a full meal and a good night’s sleep?

I have to apologise for taking so long to reply to you. I took a vacation in Mexico. That was a moving experience. Have you been? There is so much poverty. When you walk around some of those shanty villages and see the children in rags, playing in the gutters amongst so much human detritus it makes you wonder, if there is a God, why does he let his children suffer so? We, in the rich countries, use so much and chuck away so much stuff. Wouldn’t a just God make the world more equal? Or maybe we should just accept things as they are? Doesn’t it say somewhere in the Bible that the poor will always be with us? If so, then what’s the point in trying to help them if we don’t stand a chance in eradicating poverty like Bob Geldoff, Band Aid etc were pushing for? Should we just put them out of mind and carry on living our lives regardless?

Jack the confused

Jack,

Without a doubt, suffering, poverty and pain are three of the most gruesome, hard-edged realities that a Christian with trust and belief in God must face. “Must face” because they tear at our hearts and cry out that something isn’t right in this world. Indeed something isn’t right in the world and that is sin and its effects. Whether you are Christian or not, these realities should strike at the heart, for this is the human reaction.

C. S. Lewis said that pain and suffering are God’s megaphone to the world. Through these our attentions are seized and our hearts are rapt. They cry out that something isn’t right and we (should) begin looking to God.

God’s megaphone should awaken us to the reality that this world is in need of something else, or rather, Someone else. This world is in need of having its sin problem put to death and that comes only through submission to God. That only comes through changed lives as a result of meeting Christ who has created us and yearns for us to stop striving in vain against him, but turn and be healed.

Christ is our need. God’s megaphone screams this need to us.

Why does God let any human suffer, is an extremely difficult question. We can be sure that God takes no pleasure in our suffering and that it is a means to an end that is largely a mystery. Is it OK to question when struck with suffering? This is the human response. But, also when struck with suffering, we should be equally struck by our need for an outside solution, who is Christ.

Shane Claiborne, the most unique homeless-preacher-monk-man you likely will never meet, says he’s often confronted with the verse you mentioned where Jesus says that the poor will always be with us (Mark 14:7). Note his helpful response:

Almost every time we talk with affluent folks about God’s will to end poverty, someone says, “But didn’t Jesus say, ‘The poor will always be with you’?” Many of the people who whip out this verse have grown quite insulated and distant from the poor and feel defensive. I usually gently ask, “Where are the poor? Are the poor among us?” The answer is usually a clear negatory. As we study the Scriptures, we see how many texts we have misread, contextualized, and exegeted to hear what we want to. Like this one about the poor being among us, which Jesus says in the home of a leper and after a poor marginalized woman anoints his feet with perfume. The poor were all around him. Far from saying in defeat that we should not worry about the poor, since they will always be among us. Jesus is pointing the church to her true identity–she is to live close to those who suffer. The poor will always be among us, because the empire will always produce poor people, and they will find a home in the church. (P. 160)

It is a job of the church to alleviate human suffering and give a home to the sick and the impoverished. A home in both a physical and a spiritual sense. A physical home in helping to provide for basic human needs: food, shelter, and safety. A spiritual home in introducing people of all ethnicity to the Christ who came to restore all things in a world that groans and waits eagerly (Romans 8:22-24) and who cleanses the sin soiled soul.

We can take comfort in trusting God because he is just and he promises that justice will be restored when Jesus returns to judge the living and the dead. This imperfect world is groaning for the day when Jesus will return and punish the wicked and restore the fallen creation; until that day, the church (believers/Christians) must fight against sin and its effects, always sharing the hope that lies in Christ.

Faith seeking understanding,

Drew

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Swedish Greys - a WordPress theme from Nordic Themepark.